Automated detection and legal validation of structural damage, forced displacement, and attack signature analysis using satellite and drone imagery.
Pinpointing and authenticating geographic origin and timing of incident videos and photographs using AI-powered analysis.
Establish immutable, tamper-proof records of digital media lifecycle using blockchain technology.
Authenticate field audio recordings, attribute weapon or munition types, and verify timing/location through acoustic analysis.
Detect manipulated and synthetic media using advanced AI analysis to verify digital provenance.
Extract full digital file metadata for provenance tracking and chain-of-custody documentation.
Integrate multiple evidence streams for claim validation through cross-modal analysis.
Model crime scenes and attacks with photogrammetry for courtroom presentation and analysis.
Identify and prove weapon type from debris and damage patterns for legal proceedings.
Encrypted, auditable storage for all digital evidence with court-ready access controls.
Cryptographically enforced, censorship-immune storage via synchronized distributed archives.
Automatically analyze sources of digital evidence to produce reliability and provenance scores.
Auto-ingest and sequentially hash-log every stage of evidence collection and transfer.
Low-level forensic extraction and chain-of-custody logging of video, telemetry, and flight data from drones.
Comprehensively ingest, decode, hash-log, and validate encrypted messaging and mobile device evidence.
Forensic, write-blocked acquisition of full-disk or partition images from at-risk devices.
Secure, one-shot evidence upload for high-risk sources with automatic destruction and receipt confirmation.
Capture-time device signing of media frames for post-quantum verifiable provenance.
Automated analysis for detection of image, video, and voice manipulation across multiple modalities.
Creates court-ready audit bundle with hashes, citations, and regulatory compliance for each evidence item.
Extract trauma-sensitive emotions and themes from survivor testimony while minimizing re-traumatization during analysis.
Auto-transcribe, segment, and pseudonymize multilingual witness interviews for cross-border proceedings.
Machine-verifiable logging of survivor consent, opt-out, and participation in interviews and documentation.
Map testimonial consistency and credibility using cross-referencing to physical, digital, and OSINT evidence.
Code and structure free-form survivor narratives into actionable legal themes with survivor participation.
Segment survivor text by incident, emotional effect, and advice-seeking while preserving narrative integrity.
Automated pseudonymization and anonymization of survivor and witness transcripts for EU/international compliance.
Align semantic meaning across multilingual survivor testimonies for consistent legal interpretation.
Detect synthetic or cloned voice in audio testimonies to ensure authenticity.
Analyze fragmented survivor narratives to reconstruct coherent timelines while respecting trauma-induced memory patterns.
Scan testimonies for content linked to re-traumatization and flag high-risk segments for reviewer discretion.
Scan narrative files for adversarial, hostile, or impeaching content that could harm survivors in court.
Reveal contradictions and anomalies within and across survivor accounts using advanced NLP analysis.
AI ledger tracking all access, copy, sharing, and editorial events for survivor testimonies.
Real-time AI-driven update of trauma lexical databases with regional slang, metaphors, and idioms.
Transform non-linear survivor accounts into structured visual timelines and geospatial incident maps.
Apply irreversible pseudonymization to health and disability narratives while preserving case logic.
Conduct iterative review cycles with survivors allowing real-time edits, consent review, and withdrawal.
Preserve cultural nuances and context in survivor testimonies during translation and analysis.
Synthesizes individual survivor narratives into collective memory documentation that preserves community experiences while maintaining individual dignity.
AI-driven extraction and classification of war crimes-relevant case law, statutes, and tribunal rulings from ICC, ICJ, EU courts, and national jurisdictions.
AI harmonizes definitions of war crimes elements (actus reus, mens rea, command structure), threshold criteria, procedural rights, and digital-evidence admissibility across the Rome Statute, Geneva Conventions, EU/national statute books, and evolving domestic frameworks.
Aggregates, audits, and risk-scores all open arrest warrants from ICC, INTERPOL Red Notices, and national courts. Evaluates enforcement barriers including suspect immunity, jurisdictional limits, and extradition refusals using diplomatic treaty analysis and compliance overlays.
AI generates multi-layered exposure reports on state, corporate, and individual liability across global legal frameworks. Leverages graph analytics to map entity-event connections with overlays for universal jurisdiction, aiding/abetting, and sanctions exposure.
Constructs real-time, interactive graphs mapping the influence, citation patterns, and jurisprudential relationships of legal authorities among rulings, statutes, and resolutions in the war crimes accountability domain.
Auto-generates concise, contextually nuanced summaries of relevant case law, highlighting issue statements, majority/minority holdings, and rationale directly related to the facts/themes of an ongoing prosecution or investigation.
Live-tracks and audits the real-time status, legal basis, expiry, and violation risk of sanctions, arms embargoes, travel bans, and asset freezes relevant to war crimes proceedings. Automatically integrates ARCS overlays for notification and legal record-keeping.
Identifies and annotates divergent legal terms/definitions across jurisdictions and languages, especially where contested terms risk undermining legal arguments or admissibility of evidence.
Automated validator for admissibility of all evidence modalities (digital, physical, testimony) for any chosen court (ICC, ICJ, national). Scans court rules, comparator cases, and ARCF overlays to produce a flagged risk matrix.
Scans and annotates legal briefs, case theories, and procedural records to flag contradictions, conflicts, or gaps in cross-jurisdictional filings, referencing ARCS/ARCF overlays for procedural completeness.
Map which national courts can exercise universal jurisdiction over specific war crimes based on current legislation and case law.
Analyze state obligations under international humanitarian law treaties and identify compliance gaps.
Assess whether national proceedings meet ICC complementarity requirements or if ICC jurisdiction should be triggered.
Analyze immunity claims and potential waivers for state officials and diplomats in war crimes proceedings.
Analyze extradition feasibility based on bilateral treaties, political considerations, and legal obstacles.
Analyze victim participation rights across different forums and proceedings stages.
Analyze reparations frameworks and precedents across international and national mechanisms.
Analyze command responsibility elements for military and civilian superiors under international criminal law.
Analyzes state immunity issues in war crimes prosecutions, including exceptions for international crimes and civil claims.
Analyzes immunity issues for current and former heads of state and senior officials in war crimes prosecutions.
Predicts probabilities of conviction/acquittal for specific war crimes and crimes against humanity charges in ICC cases, incorporating precedent, evidence strength, and geopolitical factors.
Models likely sentencing outcomes (years, penalties) for various crimes by mining ICC and national court sentencing precedents, controlling for crime gravity, perpetrator role, and mitigating/aggravating factors.
Ranks actors by statistical likelihood of command liability based on operational logs, entity-event mappings, and historical 'pattern of conduct' analysis; highlights likely prosecutable individuals.
Generates interactive scenario trees simulating legal, political, and evidentiary developments, including cross-jurisdictional risks (e.g., new evidence, arrest warrants, political shifts).
Forecasts when, where, and why arrest/sanction/enforcement bottlenecks will arise in international proceedings; models political/legislative veto risk, extradition refusal, and evidence admissibility breakdown.
Maps current case evidence to required statutory and procedural standards, highlights chain-of-custody, or corroboration gaps, and forecasts risk of failure at motion, trial, or appeal.
Simulates downstream advocacy, public opinion, and governmental response to possible outcomes in high-impact war crimes prosecutions (e.g., genocide claim upheld/denied).
Computes the expected reach, effectiveness, and response strategies for sanctions/asset freezes triggered by investigative progress or legal filings; models likely evasion tactics and enforcement leakage.
Predicts and compares sentencing patterns across national and international jurisdictions for related charges, controlling for crime classification, precedent, and policy changes.
Optimizes prosecution timelines based on case milestones, resource availability, court calendars, and witness availability schedules.
Predicts witness reliability and credibility based on historical testimony patterns, corroboration analysis, and cross-examination vulnerability assessment.
Assesses the risk of evidence tampering or destruction based on custody patterns, access logs, and threat intelligence.
Analyzes judicial decision patterns to detect potential bias in rulings, sentencing, and procedural decisions across different case types and parties.
Predicts the likelihood of appeal success based on grounds, precedent, appellate court patterns, and procedural compliance.
Optimizes plea bargain strategies by modeling potential outcomes, sentence reductions, and cooperation benefits.
Forecasts legal costs for prosecution or defense based on case complexity, duration estimates, and resource requirements.
Predicts the impact of media coverage on case proceedings, public opinion, and witness safety.
Predicts the likelihood and nature of diplomatic interventions in war crimes proceedings based on political analysis and historical patterns.
Optimizes allocation of prosecution resources across multiple cases or case phases based on priority, complexity, and expected outcomes.
Predicts witness availability and reliability over time, accounting for security risks, health factors, and potential changes in cooperation.
Performs automated, hashchain-logged audits of all survivor and witness data processing in alignment with GDPR (Articles 5, 6, and 9), ARCS/ARCF, and trauma-aware minimization protocols.
Systematically verifies chain-of-custody, digital signatures, and compliance-tag attachment at every step of evidence lifecycle for ICC Rule 64 evidentiary admissibility.
Reviews and enforces access permissions per user, region, data sensitivity, and trauma-aware protocol overlays. Issues alerts for violations or dual-use escalations.
AI-driven scan of evidence, scenario outputs, and internal communications for dual-use or IHL violation risks, triggering mandatory human-in-the-loop escalation.
Machine-verifiable audit of survivor consent/withdrawal, mapped to narrative/itemization logs, with GDPR, UN Murad Code, and ICC overlays.
Oversight tool for tracking, logging, and exporting all AI system inferences, versioning, bias checks, and audit overlays for models deployed over war-crimes data.
Maps all AI and digital tool supply chains, scans for third-party risk, checks contractual/privacy compliance issues, and remediates vulnerabilities.
Monitors for semantic/legal drift in law, team practice, automated evidence handling, and triggers forced audit and compliance recalibration.
Attests to survivor agency at every step by validating opt-in/withdrawal, non-retraumatizing use, and participatory edits per UN Murad Code.
Produces a machine-verifiable audit bundle for any process, evidence node, or report, bundling hashchain logs, regulatory overlays, dissent indexes, and compliance manifests.
Comprehensive verification of compliance with Rome Statute requirements for evidence collection, handling, and procedural standards.
Comprehensive analysis of compliance with Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocols for incidents in armed conflict.
Audits all witness protection measures against ICC standards, ensuring identity protection, secure communications, and physical safety protocols.
Comprehensive verification of compliance with fair trial standards and rights of the accused under international law.
Audits compliance with victim participation rights, ensuring victims have proper access to proceedings, legal representation, and opportunities to present views.
Audits evidence retention practices against legal requirements, ensuring proper preservation, disposal, and documentation throughout evidence lifecycle.
Audits for conflicts of interest among all parties involved in proceedings, ensuring proper disclosure, recusal procedures, and documentation.
Audits reparations processes for compliance with ICC standards, ensuring proper assessment of harm, fair distribution, and adequate documentation.
Audits the quality and effectiveness of legal aid provided to defendants and victims in war crimes proceedings.
Audits the effectiveness of tribunal outreach programs in affected communities and measures public awareness and trust.
Ingests disparate evidence artefacts across languages, regions, and formats and applies AI-powered normalization (temporal, spatial, linguistic, device) to every relevant metadata field. Enables seamless cross-modal linkage, defeating 'local' obfuscation, timezone/locale bias, file-format drift, or data corruption.
Securely merges and archives digital evidence from NGOs and investigative teams spread across disparate legal jurisdictions using distributed ledger (blockchain) protocols. Assigns and logs unique identifiers, chain-of-custody steps, and compliance references for each artefact.
Applies graph-based pattern recognition and clustering to streaming evidence, auto-generating maps of repeated, systematic incident types (e.g., shelling, denial of aid, starvation, forced displacement). Uses anomaly detection and peer-verified escalation, aligning flagged clusters with legal doctrine on systematicity and command responsibility.
Leverages AI to automatically cross-match OSINT artefacts (from platforms, social media, crowdsourcing) with satellite imagery, field reports, and other digital traces. Identifies fabrication, manipulation or 'echo chamber' multiply-shared but unverified content; flags conflicts, issues, or unique corroborative links.
Deploys distributed crawling across open-source web, closed archives, and DNS-indexed document troves, autotagging documents and media by war crime event, risk, or threat type. Combines advanced parsing (e.g., Metagoofil, FOCA, ExifTool, SpiderFoot) with real-time classifier feedback loops.
Uses AI/ML-powered time series alignment to assemble large sets of satellite imagery into 'temporal stacks' showing before/during/after states of infrastructure, settlements, or conflict zones. Detects and highlights changes indicative of destruction, displacement, or concealment.
Analyzes evidence and case materials against multiple legal frameworks simultaneously (ICC, national courts, hybrid tribunals), identifying conflicts, gaps, and opportunities for harmonized prosecution strategies.
Automates the generation of Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) requests, Letters Rogatory, and other international cooperation instruments, ensuring compliance with bilateral and multilateral treaty requirements.
Facilitates secure coordination of witness interviews, depositions, and testimony across multiple jurisdictions, ensuring compliance with witness protection protocols and evidentiary standards.
Analyzes evidence sharing arrangements against applicable treaties, bilateral agreements, and international law requirements, identifying compliance gaps and recommending remediation measures.
Coordinates evidence transfers through diplomatic channels, ensuring proper authentication, chain of custody, and compliance with diplomatic protocols and international law.
Provides a secure platform for collaboration between NGOs, investigative journalists, and legal teams, enabling evidence sharing, case coordination, and joint analysis while maintaining security and confidentiality.
Assesses the viability of pursuing war crimes cases under universal jurisdiction principles, analyzing jurisdictional hooks, precedents, and practical considerations for prosecution in various national courts.
Assesses the complementarity principle under the Rome Statute, analyzing whether national proceedings are genuine and whether ICC intervention is warranted based on unwillingness or inability of states to prosecute.
Assists in developing comprehensive strategic litigation plans for war crimes cases, considering multiple forums, timing, sequencing, and resource allocation for maximum impact.
Coordinates engagement with victim communities, ensuring meaningful participation in legal processes, managing expectations, and facilitating communication between legal teams and affected populations.
Coordinates media engagement across international platforms, managing public communications, press releases, and media relations while protecting sensitive case information and witness identities.
Analyzes the intersection of criminal proceedings with international sanctions regimes, identifying coordination opportunities, potential conflicts, and strategies for leveraging sanctions in support of accountability.
Plans diplomatic engagement strategies to secure state cooperation with war crimes investigations and prosecutions.
Manages partnerships with civil society organizations to support war crimes documentation, victim advocacy, and public awareness.
Provide real-time transcription of courtroom proceedings with speaker identification.
Provide live translation of courtroom proceedings.
Assist with real-time evidence presentation in court.
Provide real-time assistance during witness examination.
Track and analyze legal arguments made during proceedings.
Provide real-time precedent citations during arguments.
Assist with formulating responses to objections.
Generate real-time summaries of witness testimony.
Manage and track exhibits during trial proceedings.
Track and analyze judicial rulings during proceedings.
Create and update timeline visualizations during proceedings.
Analyze cross-examination effectiveness in real-time.
Assist with preparing and delivering closing arguments.
Assist with preparing and reviewing jury instructions.
Analyze verdict implications and next steps.
Assist with sentencing hearing preparation and presentation.
Assist with victim impact statement presentation.
Assist with reparations hearing preparation and presentation.
Assist with appeal preparation during and after trial.
Provide technical support for courtroom technology systems.
Comprehensive analysis of trial judgments and their implications.
Analyze sentencing decisions and their consistency with precedent.
Analyze potential merits of appeal grounds.
Extract lessons learned from completed prosecutions.
Track implementation of reparations orders.
Manage victim notifications about case outcomes.
Generate comprehensive case closure checklists.
Plan disposition of evidence after trial completion.
Document case precedents for future reference.
Assess the broader impact of completed prosecutions.
Coordinate witness debriefing after trial completion.
Monitor enforcement of sentences and orders.
Assess risk of recidivism for convicted persons.
Plan rehabilitation programs for convicted persons.
Compile historical records of prosecutions for archives.
Generate public reports on completed prosecutions.
Assist with academic publications about completed cases.
Generate training materials from completed cases.
Generate policy recommendations from prosecution experiences.
Coordinate long-term follow-up with victims after trial.
Analyze financial flows related to war crimes funding and profiteering.
Trace assets of accused persons and criminal organizations.
Screen entities against international sanctions lists.
Detect potential money laundering activities related to war crimes.
Analyze corporate structures used to hide criminal activities.
Trace cryptocurrency transactions related to war crimes financing.
Detect procurement fraud related to conflict profiteering.
Analyze financial aspects of arms trafficking operations.
Trace conflict minerals and their financial flows.
Detect diversion of humanitarian aid for criminal purposes.
Analyze tax evasion schemes related to war crimes proceeds.
Analyze bank records for evidence of war crimes financing.
Detect insurance fraud related to conflict damage claims.
Analyze real estate transactions for war crimes proceeds laundering.
Detect trade-based money laundering schemes.
Screen for politically exposed persons in financial transactions.
Analyze financial networks of criminal organizations.
Generate expert financial reports for court proceedings.
Quantify economic damages from war crimes for reparations.
Fuse financial intelligence from multiple sources.
Analyze satellite imagery for evidence of war crimes and destruction.
Verify geolocation of evidence and incidents.
Detect potential mass grave sites using geospatial analysis.
Map destruction of infrastructure and civilian objects.
Track population displacement patterns using geospatial data.
Map patterns of attacks for evidence of systematic targeting.
Sequence events temporally to establish timelines.
Verify chronological claims in evidence and testimony.
Analyze temporal metadata in digital evidence.
Estimate duration of events based on available evidence.
Analyze networks of perpetrators and their relationships.
Map command responsibility chains for accountability.
Analyze communication networks for evidence of coordination.
Analyze social networks for evidence gathering and witness identification.
Analyze supply chain networks for weapons and resources.
Analyze organizational structures of armed groups and militaries.
Map networks of witnesses for case building.
Map victim communities for outreach and support.
Fuse intelligence from multiple network analyses.
Analyze networks operating across international borders.