Global Collaboration & Legal Strategy

Ingests disparate evidence artefacts across languages, regions, and formats and applies AI-powered normalization (temporal, spatial, linguistic, device) to every relevant metadata field. Enables seamless cross-modal linkage, defeating 'local' obfuscation, timezone/locale bias, file-format drift, or data corruption.

Securely merges and archives digital evidence from NGOs and investigative teams spread across disparate legal jurisdictions using distributed ledger (blockchain) protocols. Assigns and logs unique identifiers, chain-of-custody steps, and compliance references for each artefact.

Applies graph-based pattern recognition and clustering to streaming evidence, auto-generating maps of repeated, systematic incident types (e.g., shelling, denial of aid, starvation, forced displacement). Uses anomaly detection and peer-verified escalation, aligning flagged clusters with legal doctrine on systematicity and command responsibility.

Leverages AI to automatically cross-match OSINT artefacts (from platforms, social media, crowdsourcing) with satellite imagery, field reports, and other digital traces. Identifies fabrication, manipulation or 'echo chamber' multiply-shared but unverified content; flags conflicts, issues, or unique corroborative links.

Deploys distributed crawling across open-source web, closed archives, and DNS-indexed document troves, autotagging documents and media by war crime event, risk, or threat type. Combines advanced parsing (e.g., Metagoofil, FOCA, ExifTool, SpiderFoot) with real-time classifier feedback loops.

Uses AI/ML-powered time series alignment to assemble large sets of satellite imagery into 'temporal stacks' showing before/during/after states of infrastructure, settlements, or conflict zones. Detects and highlights changes indicative of destruction, displacement, or concealment.

Analyzes evidence and case materials against multiple legal frameworks simultaneously (ICC, national courts, hybrid tribunals), identifying conflicts, gaps, and opportunities for harmonized prosecution strategies.

Automates the generation of Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) requests, Letters Rogatory, and other international cooperation instruments, ensuring compliance with bilateral and multilateral treaty requirements.

Facilitates secure coordination of witness interviews, depositions, and testimony across multiple jurisdictions, ensuring compliance with witness protection protocols and evidentiary standards.

Analyzes evidence sharing arrangements against applicable treaties, bilateral agreements, and international law requirements, identifying compliance gaps and recommending remediation measures.

Coordinates evidence transfers through diplomatic channels, ensuring proper authentication, chain of custody, and compliance with diplomatic protocols and international law.

Provides a secure platform for collaboration between NGOs, investigative journalists, and legal teams, enabling evidence sharing, case coordination, and joint analysis while maintaining security and confidentiality.

Assesses the viability of pursuing war crimes cases under universal jurisdiction principles, analyzing jurisdictional hooks, precedents, and practical considerations for prosecution in various national courts.

Assesses the complementarity principle under the Rome Statute, analyzing whether national proceedings are genuine and whether ICC intervention is warranted based on unwillingness or inability of states to prosecute.

Assists in developing comprehensive strategic litigation plans for war crimes cases, considering multiple forums, timing, sequencing, and resource allocation for maximum impact.

Coordinates engagement with victim communities, ensuring meaningful participation in legal processes, managing expectations, and facilitating communication between legal teams and affected populations.

Coordinates media engagement across international platforms, managing public communications, press releases, and media relations while protecting sensitive case information and witness identities.

Analyzes the intersection of criminal proceedings with international sanctions regimes, identifying coordination opportunities, potential conflicts, and strategies for leveraging sanctions in support of accountability.

Plans diplomatic engagement strategies to secure state cooperation with war crimes investigations and prosecutions.

Manages partnerships with civil society organizations to support war crimes documentation, victim advocacy, and public awareness.